Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shooting of Kinsley White
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shooting of Kinsley White (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SBST and WP:GNG. While the shooting is sad and unfortunate, it also is a WP:INHERENT concern due to the event happening around the Shooting of Ralph Yarl, which it has received coverage alongside. Unless it gains substantially more notability, it should be removed for now. Wikicontributor93 (talk) 04:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 26. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Events. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:EVENTCRIT. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG at this point.BabbaQ (talk) 14:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. For clear reasons in nomination. I'm by nature an inclusionst, but this is a no from me. Moncrief (talk) 20:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep aware of WP:OTHERSTUFF but this is 100% as notable as the Shooting of Ralph Yarl with similar circumstances and similar national coverage. I'm literally following that article as a template. It makes no sense that one is notable and the other is not. --FlameRetardant (talk) 09:48, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Or the Shooting of Payton Washington. In all three cases it's a non-fatal shooting of a civilian by another civilian. In the case of Yarl and Washington the information about the suspect was allowed to be included. In those two cases there is no attempt to delete the article. Can someone tell me the difference between Ralph Yarl, Payton Washington and Kinsley White that only the article about White has garnered so much hostility? Please? --FlameRetardant (talk) 02:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- Similar circumstances doesn't determine notability. Searching Google News: shooting of Kinsley gets ~300 hits, Washington and Yarl get ~3000 hits each. So it is not similar coverage at all, its 10x less there for example. WikiVirusC(talk) 13:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Where are the minimums specified? Is 3000 a lot? The minimum? Is 30 the minimum? If so, 300 would be 10x the minimum. Just trying to get a sense of how this works. --FlameRetardant (talk) 00:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- There are no minimums or set numbers. I only gave those numbers as you compared it to those two as if it was outlandish that those weren't nominated for deletion, when they both have a very noticeable difference in coverage compared to this. WikiVirusC(talk) 12:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Where are the minimums specified? Is 3000 a lot? The minimum? Is 30 the minimum? If so, 300 would be 10x the minimum. Just trying to get a sense of how this works. --FlameRetardant (talk) 00:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Similar circumstances doesn't determine notability. Searching Google News: shooting of Kinsley gets ~300 hits, Washington and Yarl get ~3000 hits each. So it is not similar coverage at all, its 10x less there for example. WikiVirusC(talk) 13:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - not enough coverage for WP:GNG. WikiVirusC(talk) 13:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, also note that User:FlameRetardant who created the page was blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing and POV pushing. MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!(talk or whatever) 17:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.