Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Frederick Holmes
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 00:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Lee Frederick Holmes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Search ()
Despite the acting credits listed in the article, this actor has received little to no reliable source press coverage. As noted at WP:COIN, the only person interested in editing the article appears to be Lee Frederick Holmes himself. In any event, Lee Frederick Holmes has not received enough coverage in reliable sources that are independent of Lee Frederick Holmes to develop an attributable article on the topic. The topic fails general notability guidelines. If there are reliable sources, please list them in this AfD or use them in the article. -- Jreferee T/C 16:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with nom. The only thing to even suggest he's real is this article. Poor fella doesn't even have an IMDb entry.--Sethacus 20:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. He's listed on IMDb, Lee Holmes. He's not terrible good but he's notable, just. Operating 21:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Operating -Domthedude001 02:33, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Didn't see that. I searched IMDb under the full name. However, is there evidence to indicate these are notable roles? I'm a little leery about using the IMDb as it obviously contains info for more than one "Lee Holmes". Unless he played a doctor at ten.--Sethacus 03:48, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Are you kidding me? This supposed article reads like a resume. Where are the reliable non-trivial third party sources again? The only two cites are to an on-line birth certificate and ancestry.com? RFerreira 04:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It looks like he shares one film festival award for his only major role in a film that somebody actually might have seen. The rest are nn films or minor roles. Clarityfiend 06:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:BIO. Some visible roles in moderately successful films, but accomplishment is not notability, even when you're an actor. --Dhartung | Talk 06:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete agree with nom and Dhartung, nothing to prove his notability given. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 12:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I filed the original WP:COIN report. Non-notable and a pure vanity article Malson 22:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. "He's listed on IMDb" is not a valid criteria for inclusion, and as others have noted above this article fails WP:BIO in the worst way possible. Burntsauce 21:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.