- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 11:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- House of Ruello (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. There are no sources to support this, nor will there be, as there is no such thing as the "House of Ruello" in the Wikipedia sense, i.e., a single noble family. This is just a collection of a few broadly similar names pulled together at random. There is not even enough here to form the basis of a surname page, as the names mentioned here are different (Ruellan, Ruello, [du] Ruel). Eustachiusz (talk) 17:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Eustachiusz (talk) 17:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable. Borders on hoax. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete ...just delete. SNOW delete. TimothyJosephWood 13:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Incoherent mess. Choess (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, given the information presented, the best chance at verifiability seems to be a purely trivial mention. Not suitable for this project. --Killer Moff (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I actually would have !voted keep if this had been a game of thrones house. This one doesn't make the mark. The nom makes a strong point for deletion, which I accept. Lourdes 05:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.